American Orthoptic Journal Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Amer. Orthoptic Jrnl. 53(1):121-126 (2003); doi:10.3368/aoj.53.1.121
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kothari, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Nirmalan, P. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Can the Brückner Test Be Used as a Rapid Screening Test to Detect Amblyogenic Factors in Developing Countries?

Mihir T. Kothari, M.S., D.N.B.1,, Jinesh K. Turakhia, B. Opt.1, Perumalsamy Vijayalakshmi, D.O., M.S.1, Arumugam Karthika, M. Sc.2 and Praveen K. Nirmalan, D.O., M.P.H.2

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be addressed to: Dr. Mihir T. Kothari, Department of Paediatric Ophthalmology, Aravind Eye Care Center System, 1 Anna Nagar, Madurai 625 020, India. email: drmihirkothari{at}yahoo.com

Purpose: To determine the usefulness of the Brückner test as a screening tool for detection of amblyogenic factors in developing countries.

Methods: A double blind prospective study of 101 children aged 1 to 16 years attending the pediatric ophthalmology department of a tertiary eye care center. A trained optometrist masked to clinical findings of the subject performed the Brückner test in a dark room using a direct ophthalmoscope and compared differences in brightness of the pupillary reflex of both eyes. Subsequently, subjects underwent a complete ophthalmic examination by a pediatric ophthalmologist masked to the results of the Brückner test.

Results: The optometrist identified 39 subjects as Brückner test positive and 62 as Brückner test negative. On clinical examination, 12 subjects had anisometropia of ≥1D and 20 subjects had manifest deviation of >4{Delta}. The sensitivity of the Brückner test was 87.5% and specificity 84.1%; the positive (PPV) and negative predictive (NPV) value was 71.8% and 93.6%. The false positive and false negative rates were 28.2% and 6.5%.

Conclusion: Although imperfect, the Brückner test may be a low cost alternative to either screening with photo screener or to no screening for amblyogenic factors in developing countries.

Key words: Brückner test, vision screening, amblyopia, strabismus, aniso-metropia







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Copyright 2003 by The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System