American Orthoptic Journal Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Amer. Orthoptic Jrnl. 53(1):88-97 (2003); doi:10.3368/aoj.53.1.88
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castleberry, C.
Right arrow Articles by Arnoldi, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Predicting Postoperative Paradoxical Diplopia

Claire Castleberry, C.O. and Kyle Arnoldi, C.O., C.O.M.T.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be addressed to: Kyle Arnoldi, C.O., Pediatric Specialists, Missouri Baptist Medical Center, 3015 N. Ballas, Suite 351, Bldg. C, St. Louis, MO 63131. email: arnoldi{at}vision.wustl.edu

Anomalous retinal correspondence (ARC) is the mechanism that functionally links noncorresponding retinal elements in the visual cortex to allow single binocular vision in the strabismic patient. Surgical correction of the strabismus in patients with ARC may lead to temporary paradoxical diplopia. ARC may be diagnosed prior to surgery by revealing a faulty spatial orientation of the fovea of the deviating eye through a fovea-to-fovea test, or by detecting the presence of a pseudo-fovea via a fovea-to-periphery test of retinal correspondence. This retrospective study was designed to determine which type of test, fovea-to-fovea or fovea-to-periphery, is most effective at predicting postoperative diplopia in adult patients with long-standing strabismus and ARC. Of the thirteen patients enrolled in the study, 62% had temporary postoperative diplopia. One hundred percent of the diplopic patients demonstrated ARC on fovea-to-fovea tests preoperatively. Patients with ARC on fovea-to-periphery tests were just as likely to be diplopic as not after surgery. Performance on any one sensory test did not correlate well with results on any other test. Fovea-to-fovea tests are more effective than fovea-to-periphery tests at detecting ARC and predicting the likelihood of postoperative diplopia in an adult patient.

Key words: Anomalous retinal correspondence, diplopia, sensory testing







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Copyright 2003 by The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System